History Community ~ All Empires Homepage


This is the Archive on WORLD Historia, the old original forum.

 You cannot post here - you can only read.

 

Here is the link to the new forum:

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedWarning issued to Arald

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Hellios View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1927
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hellios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Warning issued to Arald
    Posted: 16-Mar-2007 at 15:53
Warning issued to Arald, as follows...
 
Originally posted by Arald Arald wrote:

I never knew turks were so obsessed about attila. is there NOTHING more interesting in your entire history? attila belongs to no nation, he was of a people that have long since vanished, only Hungary could partially claim him. are you turks equally enthusiastic about the president of kyrgystan? or are you just as intrigued by the prime minister of uzbekistan? I wouldn`t think so...you are just claiming a historically significant figure to boost your own nation's "glory", even if only artificially.
nice picture of attila by the way....you wouldn't also happen to have a few snapshots of Aetius lying around, would you? :) Or maybe an mpeg-format clip of the Battle of Chalons ?
 
 
Originally posted by wrote:

6. Nationalism, derogatory remarks to national or ethnic groups, jingoism, bigotry, racism, political propaganda. (see appendix below)
Originally posted by wrote:

This category of violations has been perhaps the most troublesome to deal with. The definition is that remarks are unacceptable if they have the intention of disparaging, belittling, or insulting another ethnic or national group. Unacceptable remarks can take the form of direct messages disparaging a national group, indirect messages overly promoting one's national group, and/or a more implicit attack, written against a particular political, cultural, or historical aspect of that national group. An acceptable remark is one that is objective and presents facts without a certain element of tone in the message. A criticism merely points out a problem, whereas an insult implies inherent inferiority. In order to make the forum less susceptible to these problems, topics regarding modern politics can only be posted in the "Intellectual discussions" section. Moderators and Administrators reserve the right to delete threads or comments that are controversial.
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.046 seconds.