|
You cannot post here - you can only read.
Here is the
link to the new forum:
|
Post Reply 
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
Brainsucker 
Housecarl 
Joined: 05-Apr-2009 Location: Indonesia Status: Offline Points: 33 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 18-Apr-2009 at 12:59 |
|
I like the Arthurian Legend, and must admit that the King Arthur is the reason why I love to study the Medieval Europe history.
But I'm a bit confuse now after realise that the existance of King Arthur is not as clear as the other historical figure. How could people know Julius Caesar and believe that he was exist but confuse with Arthur's existance? how could the writing of a 12th century historian not credible enough to determined the truth of England History around the 5th to 6th century? Or... is the Monk not a real historian and just write a fake one to please his liege? |
|
 |
|
|
gcle2003
Immortal Guard 
Joined: 06-Dec-2004 Location: Luxembourg Status: Offline Points: 7011 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2009 at 15:41 |
|
Try and get a copy of Geoffrey Ashe's The Discovery of King Arthur.
|
|
|
Citizen of Ankh-Morpork
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied - Sir Humphrey Appleby, 1984. |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
The real King Arthur.......
Topic Options