History Community ~ All Empires Homepage


This is the Archive on WORLD Historia, the old original forum.

 You cannot post here - you can only read.

 

Here is the link to the new forum:

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedStatutory law or non-statutory law?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Kapikulu View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
Points: 1921
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kapikulu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Statutory law or non-statutory law?
    Posted: 06-Apr-2007 at 19:26

Hi,

In today's world, we have two major systems of law around...One is the Roman-Germannic Law(named this way as the basis is Roman-Germannic laws; known as Continental European law as well), which has a statutory character. This means: the law system is set upon a group of laws which clarify rights, processes and obligations.
 
The other one is the common law, or Anglo-Saxon system, which the US and UK set the best examples. In this system, contrary to Contintental European system, we see the influence is over the judgments being made over decades, a case law.
 
There are notable differences between the styles of each other as well. Like the "jury" system in Common Law countries..
 
Which one do you think is better? Why?
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli
Back to Top
erkut View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
Persona non Grata

Joined: 18-Feb-2006
Location: Cyprus
Status: Offline
Points: 923
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote erkut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Apr-2007 at 19:49
Roman law is better than Anglo-Saxon law because, Roman system is more certain; there are determined punishments for every determined crime types, all clear. But Anglo-Saxon law is uncertain.
 
Roman system leans on laws, Anglo-Saxon system leans on cases.
DÜŞÜNÜYORUM O HALDE VURUN !
Back to Top
Kapikulu View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
Points: 1921
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kapikulu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Apr-2007 at 20:47
Originally posted by erkut erkut wrote:

Roman law is better than Anglo-Saxon law because, Roman system is more certain; there are determined punishments for every determined crime types, all clear. But Anglo-Saxon law is uncertain.
 
Roman system leans on laws, Anglo-Saxon system leans on cases.
 
Well, there are still acts and bills on Common Law countries, regulating some issues. Furthermore, the judges&jury have to take the previous case judgments into account in common law as well, so that the consistency is kept...
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli
Back to Top
Sparten View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar
Totalitarian Iconoclast

Joined: 18-Mar-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5009
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sparten Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Apr-2007 at 01:08
I must say the latter. Roman law is theoretical,  Common Law's emphasis on precedent is practical, its shows shows you actual worldy senarios. It is interesting to note many apprently "civil law judistrictions" have recognized the importance of a body of case law, for example the European Court of Justice.
The Germans also take vacations in Paris; especially during the periods they call "blitzkrieg".
Back to Top
TheDiplomat View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 1994
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheDiplomat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-May-2007 at 05:04
I also tend to go for the Common law for in life extraordinary cases might happen and these cases might require a much different interpration, judgement, and punishment
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!

Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Location: Luxembourg
Status: Offline
Points: 7011
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-May-2007 at 06:05
 
I don't know that there is a clear distinction between common law and statutory law countries, though the difference between the legal attitudes is clear.
 
Statutory law exists in all the so-called 'common law' countries (which the way it is normally used nowadays would be better expressed as the 'Anglo-Saxon common law' countries, though there are and have been non-Anglo-Saxon common laws).
 
And there are 'common-law' precepts in most 'statutory law' countries, though they are frequently encapsulated in constitutions (as the French constitution protects the common law concept of the presumption of innocence).
 
It's more a question of chronology. Cultures develop case law first and then statutory law, which tends initially to consist of attempts to codify common law practices.
 
It's true that the increasing use of statute law is aimed at increasing legal certitude (awareness of what the law is) but that principle itself is a common law principle. It's also true that the convolutions that drafters of statutes are drive to in trying to anticipate all possibilities frequently succeed in increasing confusion, not decreasing it.
 
(Statutes are of course the only way of changing what the law is: the common law is permanent.)
Citizen of Ankh-Morpork
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied - Sir Humphrey Appleby, 1984.
Back to Top
Dolphin View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Níl a fhios agam cad ata ag tharlu

Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 1554
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dolphin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Jul-2007 at 06:27
Common law -  as civil law attempts to legislate for all eventualities and invariably leads to discrepancies. Common law does give a lot of power to the judiciary, but I believe this legal system is preferable, as long as a teleological or purposive approach is used, not just merely an historical approach.
 


Edited by Dolphin - 03-Jul-2007 at 06:27
Am not I Dametas? Why, am not I Dametas?
Back to Top
King John View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 01-Dec-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1368
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote King John Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Aug-2008 at 22:20
I think the Common Law system is much better. The Common law is much more practical since it is based on precedent.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.