History Community ~ All Empires Homepage


This is the Archive on WORLD Historia, the old original forum.

 You cannot post here - you can only read.

 

Here is the link to the new forum:

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedPolish Winged Hussars?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 18>
Poll Question: Were the Winged Hussars the best cavalry untis in the time period?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
63 [58.88%]
11 [10.28%]
29 [27.10%]
4 [3.74%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 368
Post Options Post Options   Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Polish Winged Hussars?
    Posted: 06-Sep-2004 at 09:12

Manchu Banner soldier about 1800

Manchu Banner soldier (circa 1800)

Circassian cavalry (circa 1800) 

Back to Top
Mosquito View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 05-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1491
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mosquito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Sep-2004 at 14:58
Hmm. small horses, spears, no armour, no firearms. They doesnt look like guys who would be able to defeat winged husars, especially because they also fought tartars and knew that kind of enemy. And in close comabt i guess they would be smashed, no matter how good riders they were.
Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Post Options Post Options   Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Sep-2004 at 15:01
Originally posted by Mosquito

Hmm. small horses, spears, no armour, no firearms. They doesnt look like guys who would be able to defeat winged husars, especially because they also fought tartars and knew that kind of enemy. And in close comabt i guess they would be smashed, no matter how good riders they were.

Well, horses were smaller back then. The Swedish cavalry rode animals we would call ponnies today...
I suspect continental cavalry had smaller horses too, even if not that small.

Edited by Styrbiorn
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar
AE Editor & Pet Platypus

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4720
Post Options Post Options   Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Sep-2004 at 02:36
polish had large (really) horses
There is no emotion, there is peace.
There is no ignorance, there is knowledge.
There is no passion, there is serenity.
There is no chaos, there is harmony.
There is no death, there is the Force.
Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 368
Post Options Post Options   Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Sep-2004 at 09:42
Average weight of the hussar's horse was slightly above 500 kg so for the modern standards they are small or average but certainly not the ponnis...
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5237
Post Options Post Options   Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Sep-2004 at 13:27

the armour of the bannermen was lght and effective, and thoroughly, I think they're the best worldwide, though they lacked lance-cavalry.

Circassians were light indeed, but keep in mind Hussars were not the only cavalry of Polish armies.

Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 368
Post Options Post Options   Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Sep-2004 at 15:14
Frankly speaking I don't think any archery-based cavalry of this time could be competitive for hussars especially when they are supported by light banners (for wing protection).. 
Back to Top
Landsknecht_Doppelsoldner View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 557
Post Options Post Options   Quote Landsknecht_Doppelsoldner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Sep-2004 at 11:03
Originally posted by Mosquito

Accidentally i found what was that. It was Dalmatian rider (maybe even Serb Usar) but in the Venetian serivce. They were called "stratori" or somthing like that.

You're thinking of the famous Balkan stradiotti, who were employed by the Venetians as a nice counter to Turkish light cavalry (akincis, etc).  These lightly-armored troopers fought with a light lance, a saber (sciabla), and sometimes a composite bow.  Alternatively, some stradiotti may have used the local form of straight, basket-hilted broadsword (the so-called schiavona).  They were comparable to Hungarian hussars and Spanish jinetes.

And speaking of "hussar", I'm not so sure if we have a definitive answer regarding the origins of either the word itself, of the type of soldier the word described.  AFAIK, the first troops called "hussars" were from Serbia, and they were light cavalry (as opposed to later Polish hussars).  This light type became understandably popular with the Hungarians, Transylvanians, Moldavians, etc.

As for the Polish Winged Hussars, their war record is definitely impressive, but they did indeed suffer defeats--witness the destruction of the Polish "Quarter" Army at Batoh by the Cossacks, in 1652.  It's also interesting to note that German cavalry (ritters or reiters--rajtars to the Poles) were actually paid more money than hussars were, by King John Casimir, after the fiasco at Batoh.

Peace,

David Black Mastro



Edited by Landsknecht_Doppelsoldner
"Who despises me and my praiseworthy craft,

I'll hit on the head that it resounds in his heart."


--Augustin Staidt, of the Federfechter (German fencing guild)
Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 368
Post Options Post Options   Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 11:54

AFAIK, the first troops called "hussars" were from Serbia, and they were light cavalry (as opposed to later Polish hussars).  This light type became understandably popular with the Hungarians, Transylvanians, Moldavians, etc.

Yep..they were light cavalry also in Poland up to the time of king stephan batory when they have adopt armour.

As for the Polish Winged Hussars, their war record is definitely impressive, but they did indeed suffer defeats--witness the destruction of the Polish "Quarter" Army at Batoh by the Cossacks, in 1652.

Well, I would rather not connect the slaughter at Batoh with decline of Winged Hussars. There were only 8 or 9 banners of hussars at Batoh in total about 1000 soldiers when whole polish army consist of about 10 000 soldiers. The main factor was the rebellion of polish cavalry.

It's also interesting to note that German cavalry (ritters or reiters--rajtars to the Poles) were actually paid more money than hussars were, by King John Casimir, after the fiasco at Batoh.

It is not exactly..there was not one fixed salary for certain type of soldier - it was always depend from which region soldiers were -for exapmle the quater salary of hussars from Cracow was on the level of 40 zlotych, when the hussars from Sandomierz got 60 z³ and from Lublin  and Belz even 80 zl. In the same period the reiters form Mazovia got 60 zl and from £eczyca 60 zl...

 

Back to Top
Mosquito View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 05-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1491
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mosquito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2004 at 06:20

Hello Landsknecht_Doppelsoldner (Cohort).

Here is Raf.S from THC forum.

Im glad that you decided to join this AE forum and hope that you feel well here.

Greeting from Luxor (Aegipt) to all of you and see you after ill come back home.

 

Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar
AE Editor & Pet Platypus

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4720
Post Options Post Options   Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Sep-2004 at 23:01
but as the deafeats - what army hasnt been defeated???
There is no emotion, there is peace.
There is no ignorance, there is knowledge.
There is no passion, there is serenity.
There is no chaos, there is harmony.
There is no death, there is the Force.
Back to Top
ihsan View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 831
Post Options Post Options   Quote ihsan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2004 at 16:16
Actually, a great amount of Circassian riedrs were wearing heavy chain armor up until maybe late 18th century, they were noted to be the last heavy cavalry people(s) of Europe.
[IMG]http://img50.exs.cx/img50/6148/ger3.jpg">

Qaghan of the Vast Steppes

Steppes History Forum
Back to Top
Rava View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 166
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rava Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2004 at 17:01

Isn't it beautiful...

 

Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Location: Vatican City State
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
Post Options Post Options   Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 06:48

The helmet in the first picture looks almost Roman. The protruding visor, and the extended backflap resembles a legionary helmet.

Back to Top
Quetzalcoatl View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 05-Aug-2004
Location: Jamaica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 985
Post Options Post Options   Quote Quetzalcoatl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Oct-2004 at 19:21

 

 

 I think you've forgotten the Napoleonic Hussar. Under De LaSalle, they were the most feared units in Europe. They were better than the Hussars of all other europeans armies of the time and they have excellent combat record. Which Prince of Prussia did quarter master Guindet killed?

Creativity is key
Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 368
Post Options Post Options   Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Oct-2004 at 13:19
Originally posted by Evildoer

The helmet in the first picture looks almost Roman. The protruding visor, and the extended backflap resembles a legionary helmet.

 

Yeah, the helmet as well as the armour (anime type) is modelled as roman.

 

I think you've forgotten the Napoleonic Hussar. Under De LaSalle, they were the most feared units in Europe. They were better than the Hussars of all other europeans armies of the time and they have excellent combat record. Which Prince of Prussia did quarter master Guindet killed?

They were excellent soldiers especially 5th and 7th (Lassale's brigade) but they belongst to the another epoch....

BTW Guindey have killed prince Louis Ferdinand of Prussia at Saalfed

 

 



Edited by TJK
Back to Top
Quetzalcoatl View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 05-Aug-2004
Location: Jamaica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 985
Post Options Post Options   Quote Quetzalcoatl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Oct-2004 at 20:28

BTW Guindey have killed prince Louis Ferdinand of Prussia at Saalfed

 

 That Prince Fredinand was an excellent Prussian General.  It was a heavy loss to the enemy in fact, he was the only one doing everything right. How unfortunate for the Prussian. 

 

Creativity is key
Back to Top
Lannes View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 440
Post Options Post Options   Quote Lannes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Oct-2004 at 20:32
Originally posted by Evildoer

The helmet in the first picture looks almost Roman. The protruding visor, and the extended backflap resembles a legionary helmet.

Well, Roman neck flaps were positioned in a more vertical manner(at least, from the Coolus onwards).  Not to mention that the 'visor' was positioned higher up in a Coolus or Imperial-Gallic helmet, and generally, didn't jut out near as much.

Not to mention that it lacks the curved ear guards(and I may have glossed it over a bit much, but do the cheek pieces seem to be so large that they don't allow room for an earhole in the Polish helmet?) of the Imperial-Gallic and Itlaic helmet designs.



Edited by Lannes
~Magister Utriusque Militae~
The lamplight o'er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor; And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor shall be lifted---nevermore!
Back to Top
cavalry4ever View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 17-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 249
Post Options Post Options   Quote cavalry4ever Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Nov-2004 at 14:17
Originally posted by TJK

Winged Hussars have became heavy cavalry after reforms of polish king Stephan Batory in the second half of XVI centaury. For about 50 years this formation was a king of battlefield able to crush every other or even combined formation. The best achievements were battle of Kircholm (defeat of 3xbigger Swedish army ) and battle of Klushino (defeat of 5xtimes bigger Russian army). After the reforms of Gustav Adolf western type infantry (especially Swedish) became nearly invincible for the sole cavalry action (including winged hussars). The position of the best cavalry of Europe was held however by winged hussars up to the neraly end of XVII centaury.

In XVIII centaury this formation was just obsolete and with poor morale and trainning was only a "shadow" of  XVII centaury predecessors...

So my answer is: "yes at all" for the period 1570-1620, "best in Europe" up to the 1683 and definitely "no" for the XVIII centaury...

..and I don't know how to vote      

Back to Top
cavalry4ever View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 17-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 249
Post Options Post Options   Quote cavalry4ever Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Nov-2004 at 14:19

First appearance of hussars dates to 1514 at the battle of Orsza.

Originally posted by TJK

Winged Hussars have became heavy cavalry after reforms of polish king Stephan Batory in the second half of XVI centaury. For about 50 years this formation was a king of battlefield able to crush every other or even combined formation. The best achievements were battle of Kircholm (defeat of 3xbigger Swedish army ) and battle of Klushino (defeat of 5xtimes bigger Russian army). After the reforms of Gustav Adolf western type infantry (especially Swedish) became nearly invincible for the sole cavalry action (including winged hussars). The position of the best cavalry of Europe was held however by winged hussars up to the neraly end of XVII centaury.

In XVIII centaury this formation was just obsolete and with poor morale and trainning was only a "shadow" of  XVII centaury predecessors...

So my answer is: "yes at all" for the period 1570-1620, "best in Europe" up to the 1683 and definitely "no" for the XVIII centaury...

..and I don't know how to vote      

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 18>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.