![]() |
You cannot post here - you can only read.
Here is the
link to the new forum:
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
Cryptic ![]() General ![]() Joined: 05-Jul-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 901 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Jewish concept of God changed from "Yahweh is the only God of Israel" to "Yahweh is the only God in existance". I do not know when this change occurred (Probably post Babylonian Exile period). By the time of Christ, however, Jewish religous thought presented Yahweh as the only existing God. |
|
![]() |
|
Leonidas ![]() Immortal Guard ![]() ![]() Joined: 01-Oct-2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 4617 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and before Yahweh there is Elohim of Genesis, which is pluralistic.
AFAIK, multiple creator > tribal god> to the universal one (creator) |
|
![]() |
|
Cryptic ![]() General ![]() Joined: 05-Jul-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 901 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The plural Elohim has always puzzled me.
Perhaps it is a textual typo or more probably represents a subtle linguistical shift in the meaning of the word (similar to the decline of the plural implied, "royal we" concept in English).
If it is truly a plural... then why was it not "corrected" by later scribes? There is, of course, a strong rule about correcting sacred scriptures, but the temptation for at least some scribes to correct the old "Elohim = plural gods notion" must have been pretty strong. Especially as Jewish thought went from "our only tribal God" to the "one universal God".
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |